The phrase "average scores with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the context of comparing or analyzing average scores in relation to something else, such as a group or a specific criterion.
Example: "The study aimed to analyze the average scores with respect to different teaching methods employed in the classroom."
Alternatives: "mean scores alongside" or "average results in conjunction with".
In all three fields, Japan ranked first and Finland second in average scores, with the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway near the top.
The instrument recognition test showed a significant enhancement with Clarinet using Smt-MF but in general revealed a significant decrease in average scores with semitone mapping.
The results also showed no significant difference of average scores with respect to trust-integrity between avatar-present (M = 4.45, SD = .78) and avatar-absent conditions (M = 4.37, SD = .91), t(114) = .487, p = .627.627
All the domains of quality of life had below average scores, with the lowest scores on the "Overall health" general item and the highest for the "Social relations" domain.
One approach that has been used to meet this challenge is problem-oriented reporting [ 17], where problem scores for individual variables are reported instead of average scores with high ceiling-effects.
Attributes in bold indicate correlation of 0.5 or greater Nearly all items on the ideal job attributes instrument received high average scores, with the per cent rated as "important" (3 or 4 on the 0 to 4 scale) greater than 75% for all items other than "keeping job as long as you want" and "independence form interference"(Table 3).
The gray area is the average score with confidence interval, which narrows towards the referendum day when the number of users increases.
A score of 50 is taken to be the average score with higher scores indicating frequency or severity of symptoms.
The average score with regards to comfort in rendering care to PLWHA, calculated out of a maximum score of 26 marks was 16.4 (63%), with a median score of 18 (69%).
Unsurprisingly, the average scores obtained with these query alignments were slightly better (data not shown).
