The phrase "average revision" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the typical or mean changes made to a document, project, or piece of work during the revision process.
Example: "After reviewing the feedback, I made an average revision to the report to improve clarity and coherence."
Alternatives: "typical revision" or "mean revision".
The average revision over the last decade has been about 200,000.
Since the start of 2007 the average revision has been to reduce growth by 0.1% a month.
Indeed, according to the Commerce Department, the average revision of G.D.P. growth between the advance estimate and the final estimate is 0.7 percentage points.
But the reality is that since the first quarter of 2008 the average quarterly revision has been zero; the average revision has also been zero in the 88 quarters since the first of 1993, when the present data series started.
Results: The average revision THA patient stayed 10.5 days, improved from an admission FIM score of 89 to a discharge FIM score of 110, and incurred a hospital charge of $10,600.
Indeed, the bureau on Page 18 of its G.D.P. release indicates that the average revision of the data is 0.6 percentage points between the first estimate and the third, though this includes revisions both up and down.
On average, the revision rate data of the Oxford team have been 2.7 times lower than the revision rates quoted in the independent literature, and 4.4 times lower than the results from worldwide registry data.
It corresponds to an average downward revision to the budget deficit of one quarter of 1 per cent of GDP".
The average absolute revision since Q1 2005 has been 0.4%, which means commentators could currently be arguing over the head of a pin.
Taking a slightly longer-term view, the average absolute revision (i.e. ignoring the +/- sign) since Q1 2005 has been 0.4% (higher than the average growth rate, itself) - and that includes the most recent year or so, for which the revisions process has hardly started.
Ironically, the August jobs number has been wrong about 75percentt of the time and usually far to the downside, with the average upward revision of 74,000.
