Sentence examples for average retinal sensitivity from inspiring English sources

The retinal sensitivity threshold map was automatically registered to the color fundus photo, and the overall average retinal sensitivity was calculated (Fig.  2).

The average retinal sensitivity (in dB) of the macular area was significantly lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB in peeled eyes versus 13.19±2.92 dB in unpeeled eyes (p=0.0209).

The mean retinal sensitivity within the central 10° was measured with a fundus-related microperimeter (MP1, Nidek, Gamagori, Japan).

The mean retinal sensitivity increased from 0.3 dB before treatment (Figure 3C) to 4.1 dB after treatment (Figure 3D).

Mean retinal sensitivity within the central 10° in microperimetry increases from 0.3 dB before treatment to 4.1 dB.

The mean retinal sensitivity loss of the sham group was 45% greater than that of the treated group (decrease, 15.81±8.93 dB; P = 0.07).

On the basis of the microperimetry findings, we evaluated mean retinal sensitivity (primary outcome), the presence of absolute or relative microscotomas with a retinal sensitivity of less than 10 dB, and the average lowest dB, in eyes that underwent ILM peeling and those that did not.

The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity.

Mean retinal sensitivity was calculated from the sensitivity for each of nine subfields on the retinal map generated by OCT.

We expressed all the variables as mean ± SD when appropriate, taking into account the average of the retinal sensitivity values at the various points of analysis.

The least sensitive point in the pattern, reflecting the depth of the retinal sensitivity decrease, had an average value of 1.38±3.16 dB in the group with ILM peeling, versus 7.25±4.83 dB in the control group with no peeling (p=0.0243).