Sentence examples for average relevance from inspiring English sources

Compute the average relevance value on the frequency range, as ρ rF = E { ρ ij : ∀ j }   3.

Large bank managers attach an average relevance to the trend analysis of the credit relationship and a great importance to guarantees.

The questionnaire was structured using the Likert scale with 6 increasing scores: 1 = no relevance of the information, 2 = low relevance, 3 = average relevance, 4 = high relevance, 5 = very high relevance, and 6 = decisive relevance.

Regarding the quantitative information on SMEs (Table 1), the survey results show, however, the following: Large bank managers attach an average relevance to the trend analysis of the credit relationship and a great importance to guarantees.

The questionnaire was structured using the Likert scale with six increasing scores: 1 = no relevance of the information, 2 = low relevance, 3 = average relevance, 4 = high relevance, 5 = very high relevance and 6 = decisive relevance to the opening of the credit line.

Estimate the relevance measure ρ(x ij |c) of the t f points, building the relevance map R: R = ρ ( x 11 | c ) ρ ( x 12 | c ) … ρ ( x 1 T | c ) ρ ( x 21 | c ) ρ ( x 22 | c ) … ρ ( x 2 T | c ) ⋮ ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ ρ ( x F 1 | c ) ρ ( x F 2 | c ) … ρ ( x FT | c ). Compute the average relevance value on the frequency range, as ρ rF = E { ρ ij : ∀ j }.

NIHR HTA reports had an average mean relevance rating of 5.48 (95% CI 5.36 to 5.59), which was higher than the mean relevance rating for non-NIHR HTA publications passing CAP and MORE criteria, which was 5.32 (95% CI 5.31 to 5.33) (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, p=0.01; table 3).

The average immunological relevance score over all genes in each database was determined, compared against each other and the genes not manually curated by these resources.

NIHR HTA-funded publications publishing outside HTA had an average mean relevance rating of 5.59 (95% CI 5.42 to 5.75), which was slightly higher than the rating for NIHR HTA reports (mean difference=0.11, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.32, p=0.419).

The average clinical relevance rating for NIHR HTA reports was 5.48, statistically higher than the 5.32 rating for non-NIHR HTA publications (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, p=0.01).

For this purpose, we calculated the pairwise fold change comparisons of the differentially expressed genes among the 79 tissues profiles from the SymAtlas project [ 24] and the average immunological relevance score for those differentially expressed genes (shown in heatmap Figure 4A).