Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(46)
The resulting models show a satisfactory accuracy in validation terms (e.g., average relative errors of 50%).
The average relative errors of prediction are 7.8%, 4.5%, 4.9% and 2.7%, respectively.
The average relative errors between simulation and experiment were less than 10%.
The average relative errors in ¯¯¯P and CU between the measured and simulated values were 3.46% and 2.46%, respectively.
The average relative errors in simulation decreased from 5.2%to2.8%8% and from 12.8% to 3.7%, respectively.
The average relative errors were estimated as 3.16% and 6.45% for melting point, Tm, and ln vis), respectively.
Similar(14)
The average relative error for DG was 14.6%.
The average relative error between the measured data and FE model predictions is 7.95%.
On the other hand, distillate flow rate reached an average relative error of 42%.
The average relative error of the original RBF neural network is 1.55% in 158 epochs.
The average relative error of prediction was found to be 1%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com