The phrase "average priority" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where tasks, items, or issues are being ranked or categorized based on their importance or urgency.
Example: "The project has an average priority compared to the other tasks on our list, so we will address it after the high-priority items."
Alternatives: "medium priority" or "moderate priority".
The final result is based on the normalized average priority among the several rotations.
After the meeting, the SRA enters all these ratings into a computer, calculates an average priority score for each application, and ranks them ("percentiling").
The next step is to find consistency matrix, the matrix consistency is obtained from pairwise comparison matrix multiplication Table 1 with average priority weight in Table 3. Consistency matrix is shown in Table 4. Table 4 Matrix consistency table ax 2.979 1.720 0.967 0.532 0.292 0.169.
The data are broken down by: (A) preliminary individual and average priority scores: (B) magnitude of differences; (C), the degree to which the final priority score was outside the minimum and maximum of the individual assigned reviewer's preliminary priority scores; (D), the magnitude of differences as a function of final priority score and (E) the practical consequences.
The average priority level estimated for all informants was used to rank them.
Cluster 6, "support services within the company", was given the lowest average priority.
> Table 4 displays the average priorities for each criterion at level 2 and the average weights for the two alternatives with respect to each criterion at level 3.
The average priorities for the second level criteria of accuracy, complications, and test preparation were 0.457, 0.321, and 0.223, respectively, indicating that participants considered accuracy as the most important, followed by complications, and test preparation.
In Eq. 8, budget reservation to each application is defined as a weighted average of priority and estimated budget usage so that judicious amount of budget is reserved to each application according to its requirement.
Particularly when α 4≥0.55, the average delay of priority class 4 based on NS is lower; however, the average delays of other high priority classes are dramatically increased (>102 slots) and which is not acceptable.
In that period, international priority average daily shipments grew by 23 percent.
