The phrase "average pressure coefficients" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, or engineering when discussing the average values of pressure coefficients in a given scenario.
Example: "The study analyzed the average pressure coefficients across various wing designs to determine their aerodynamic efficiency."
Alternatives: "mean pressure coefficients" or "typical pressure coefficients".
The predicted pressure modification coefficient may be used to estimate average pressure coefficients taking into account the indoor velocity coefficients, surface porosity, window design, and interior partition types.
The first phase of the project focused on the development of a parametric model to determine the average pressure coefficients on exterior building surfaces shielded by a single windward obstruction model block.
The average pressure coefficient values on the windward face are almost comparable at all levels, while on the smooth face and side faces the lower levels have a minimum value compared to higher levels.
The reservoir has no obvious edge water, the average pressure in the central reservoir is 21.06 MPa, and the average pressure coefficient is 0.937.
The absolute values of average mean pressure coefficients on side face-B and face-D reduce as the side ratio of the models increases due to the reattachments of flow.
Mean pressure coefficient = Mean pressure 1 12 2 ρ v 2 (1).
The averaged differences between measurement and predicted results are 14.49% (mean pressure coefficient) and 13.74% (fluctuating pressure coefficient).
The results indicate that the most critical negative peak area-averaged net pressure coefficients considering all wind directions and all panels show an increasing tendency with increase in side ratio, but that the most critical positive peak values show no significant change.
Table 2 Face average values of pressure coefficients for 0° wind incidence angle Location Face average values of pressure coefficient Face A 0.78 Face B −0.29 Face C −0.94 Face D −0.37 Face E −0.58 Face F −0.36 Face G −0.92 Face H −0.29.
An increase in the pressure is observed to have an equal effect on the basefluid and on the nanofluids, which results in an average pressure-viscosity coefficient for both to be approximately 0.015 mm2/N.
The shape optimization for a scale model of a low pressure exhaust hood is numerically performed to maximize the mass averaged pressure recovery coefficient while subjecting to geometric constraints.
