Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Call-buyers paid an average premium of $0.30 per contract to take ownership of the contracts.
The majority of the call options were purchased for an average premium of $0.50 per contract.
Approximately 4,400 of the calls were purchased at an average premium of $0.20 a-pop.
Optimistic investors shed 1,300 puts at the July $24 strike for an average premium of $0.17 apiece, and also sold 4,200 puts at the higher July $25 strike to pocket an average premium of $0.40 per contract.
Traders purchased 17,000 puts at the November $29 strike for an average premium of $1.75 each, and sold the same number of puts at the lower November $25 strike at an average premium of $0.40 apiece.
Traders sold approximately 2,500 puts at the August $75 strike for an average premium of $2.13 apiece, and purchased the same number of puts at the lower August $70 strike for an average premium of $1.02 a-pop.
Bearish traders purchased roughly 10,000 puts at the July $21 strike for an average premium of $0.625 apiece, and sold about 10,000 puts at the lower July $19 strike for an average premium of $0.23 each.
Investors picked up roughly 6,000 calls at the June $8.0 strike for an average premium of $0.23 apiece, and sold about the same number of calls at the higher June $9.0 strike for an average premium of $0.03 each.
Ratio put-spreaders purchased 20,000 of the January $21 strike puts for an average premium of $0.34 per contract, and sold 40,000 puts at the lower January $20 strike at an average premium of $0.10 each.
Traders picked up approximately 1,500 calls at the November $24 strike at an average premium of $0.74 each, and sold about the same number of calls at the higher November $26 strike for an average premium of $0.29 apiece.
The optimistic player sold 4,000 puts at the November $15 strike for an average premium of $0.56 each in order to purchase 2,000 calls at the higher November $16 strike at an average premium of $0.55 apiece.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com