Sentence examples for average preliminary scores from inspiring English sources

The degree and direction of change from the average preliminary scores to the final priority scores included some that got better scores, some that were worse and others that did not change.

In addition, this study will consider the practical consequences of any final priority score change from the average preliminary score.

The maximum observed changes in average preliminary score to final priority score was an improvement of +1.29 and decline of −1.34.

In this study approximately 13.3% of applications with priority scores of 1.75 or better have final priority scores that differ by 0.15 or more from their average preliminary score.

While there is a significant difference between average preliminary and final priority scores over all, this does mean that there was a practical significance.

Most differences between average preliminary and final priority scores were in a more narrow range.

There is a moderate correlation (0.78) between the average preliminary and final priority scores for R01 applications reviewed by CSR/NIH.

BASE then normalizes the preliminary score against the average of the absolute value of the preliminary scores from 1,000 permuted gene sets of equal size to the target gene set.

These scores may be the same as or different than their pre-discussion preliminary scores.

The assigned reviewer's scores established the preliminary score range (e.g., if preliminary scores were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.6, the preliminary score range would be 1.2 to 1.6 – with 1.2 being the best and 1.6 being the worst preliminary score).

For the purposes of this study the preliminary score refers to the average of the three assigned reviewers' independent scores, expressed to two decimal places.