The phrase "average preferences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the typical or mean preferences of a group or population in various contexts, such as surveys, studies, or market research.
Example: "The study revealed that the average preferences of consumers leaned towards eco-friendly products."
Alternatives: "typical preferences" or "mean preferences".
Readers won by picking the faces that "most nearly corresponded to the average preferences of the competitors as a whole".
Past research has suggested that, regardless of their average preferences, women are most attracted to hyper-masculine features when they are most likely to conceive, and that the effect is particularly exaggerated in women who are in stable relationships.
The representative average preferences of the final clusters are obtained as the estimates of engineering parameters to control the surface roughness of the commercial polymer-based products.
Also, since a regression determines the conditional expected value of the dependent variable, it measures average preferences rather than those of an individual person [31].
In this regard, the inclusion of requesters endowed with average preferences relative to those of the standard users composing the network acts as a connectivity-enhancing mechanism designed to reduce the dispersion and differences existing between clusters.
Such average preferences and null expectations were also estimated for motif preferences derived from native and site-randomized intronic and non-genic DNA.
The average preference score was not significantly different between frovatriptan (2.9 ± 1.3) and rizatriptan (3.2 ± 1.1).
The average preference score was not significantly different between frovatriptan (3.1 ± 1.3) and almotriptan (3.4 ± 1.3).
But when they were unlikely to conceive, the average preference was for faces that were 20% more feminine.
It can be seen that the respondents' average preference for moral leadership is the highest (M = 4.96), followed by preference for transformational leadership (M = 4.39) and benevolent leadership (M = 3.57).
The remaining subjects had an average preference, as measured by the fraction of all intermittent presentation sequences won by their preferred percept, of 0.57 (σ = 0.05) and 0.61 (σ = 0.06) for the sphere and rivalry, respectively.
