Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "average pairwise difference" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in statistical or mathematical contexts when discussing the average of the differences between pairs of values in a dataset.
Example: "To analyze the variability in the data, we calculated the average pairwise difference among the samples."
Alternatives: "mean pairwise difference" or "average difference between pairs".
Exact(30)
For each simulation, we calculated several statistics for four measures of genetic diversity (total number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity or heterozygosity, average pairwise difference and nucleotide diversity).
Intra-population measures of diversity (number of haplotypes, gene diversity, nucleotide diversity, average pairwise difference, and number of segregating sites (θs)) were calculated for each species using the software ARLEQUIN (Version 3.1) [32].
Below diagonal: corrected average pairwise difference (PiXY- PiX+PiY)/2).
The average pairwise difference per site [ 18, 19].
The average pairwise difference between the citrus clade and the B. delagoense clade is 2.96% for COI gene (Fig. 3).
Below diagonal, F ST value- Diagonal elements, average number of pairwise differences within population (PiX)- Above diagonal, corrected average pairwise difference (PiXY- PiX + PiXY- PiX
Similar(30)
Haplotype diversity and average pairwise differences indicated a lower level of genetic diversity among the Kazakh populations when compared to published data from other Central Asians.
The average pairwise differences by population range from 1.69 to 7.42.
For mtDNA, the average pairwise differences as well as the weighted intra-lineage mean pairwise difference (WIMP) [ 23] were calculated.
This result confirms the low polymorphism obtained from average pairwise differences between copies observed by Carlton et al. [ 9].
Genetic divergence (k) between P. vivax isolates and P. cynomolg i was estimated using the average pairwise differences per gene.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com