The phrase "average of the relationships" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a statistical or mathematical concept related to the mean value of various relationships, such as in social sciences or data analysis.
Example: "To better understand the dynamics of our team, we calculated the average of the relationships among members based on their feedback."
Alternatives: "mean of the relationships" or "typical value of the relationships".
Computation parameters were: distance of one pixel between two neighbouring pixels, average of the angular relationships on the four main directions, five bits of grey levels.
Furthermore, for each crossbred individual in the validation population, the average of the top10 relationships between this individual and individuals in the reference population [ 28] was also computed.
He found that average score of the relationship between franchisee and head office, marked on a 1-5 scale where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent, is currently just 1.48, down from a historical average of 2.1.
The resulting linear fit provided a readily interpretable estimate of the average magnitude of the relationship between the two variables.
Therefore, the regression coefficients will measure the average size of the relationship between volume and costs over all teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the US This approach is the most reasonable one for a nationwide policy simulation.
Overall, the findings show that, on average, about 15percentt of the relationships that survey takers talked about were categorized as difficult, and that their conflicts were most often with close kin such as parents, siblings and spouses.
The relationship between two individuals in the animal model is twice the average of the four gametic relationships (coancestry) for the two individuals, and the animal genetic variance is twice the gametic variance.
The authors of [ 31] found that the average of the top 10 relationships with training animals (ave10) was a better predictor of estimated accuracies than the maximum relationship, while the opposite was observed in this study.
We quantified relatedness in this study as the average of the top 10 relationships observed within the G matrix (re/10).
The best predictor for this association was the average of the top five relationships between a testing animal and animals in the training set (ave5), for which the average correlation with rPEV across traits was 0.81.
