Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
The phrase "average number of point" is not correct in English.
It should be "average number of points." You can use it when discussing statistical data or measurements that involve counting items or occurrences.
Example: "The average number of points scored by the team this season is 75."
Alternatives: "mean number of points" or "typical number of points."
Exact(1)
For our study we used 3,337 square cells of linear size 25 km which corresponds to an average number of point collections of about 20.
Similar(59)
The average number of contigged BACs per BES-SSR anchor point was 51.
The average number of points paid in 2011, according to a Freddie Mac survey, was 0.7 percentage points, less than half the levels people paid in the 1990s.
13.9 The average number of points the Steelers' defense allowed this season, the fewest in the N.F.L. 8 The number of interceptions by the Chargers' defense in the final four regular-season games.
This prediction is based on the team's good run at the end of the past season, the limited expectations of his club and the average number of points Portsmouth gained over the past 10 games.
The average number of points per club was weighted so that the last five games were as important as all the previous games under the same manager put together.
An article on Dec. 26 about John C. Dearie, a New York lawyer who runs a mobile law office in a bus, misstated the average number of points he scored per game while playing basketball for Notre Dame.
Over the last 10 seasons, including the current campaign, the average number of points separating the teams competing for a place in the Champions League between 3rd and 8th has been 13.1 points - a figure that highlights how fascinating this year's tussle is developing to be.
The average number of points scored per pupil is then used to rank the schools.
Hence, the average number of points per person can vary significantly with the people density.
Figure 6 shows the average number of points for operators that felt assistance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com