Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
The average nanoparticle diameter was found to be around 208 nm, as determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA).
Models were developed for the Nusselt number and the pressure drop of the nanofluid as a function of Reynolds and Prandtl numbers, nanofluid volume concentration and average nanoparticle diameter.
The average nanoparticle diameter value determined was 29 ± 18 nm.
Fig. 4 SAR as a function of the average nanoparticle diameter D for dilute assemblies of fractal clusters of nanoparticles with various fractal descriptors.
(b) SAR as a function of the average nanoparticle diameter D for dilute assemblies of clusters of nanoparticles with different packing density η.
TiO2 paste (10 wt%) was prepared by mixing nanocrystalline TiO2 nanoparticles (TG-P25, Degussa, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan; the average nanoparticle diameter was about 25 to 30 nm) with tert-butyl alcohol and deionized water.
Similar(52)
In addition to bulk techniques such as X-ray diffraction, chemisorption, and EXAFS that generally yield average nanoparticle diameters within a supported catalyst, direct imaging using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) allows precise determination of nanoparticle dimensions and dispersion.
The results showed that the average nanoparticles diameter ranged from 10 to 40 nm for different oxide nanoparticles.
By assuming the averaged nanoparticle diameter of 80 nm, this shell thickness indicates that the content of Al is about 50%.
The observed smaller Au nanoparticle diameter of approximately 1.5 explains the result that the average BET nanoparticle diameter becomes smaller with Au loading as the average particle size will be reduced by the contribution of smaller particles.
The lattice fringes exhibit the typical distances, i.e., Ag(1 1 1) and ZnO(1 0 0) and the average Ag and ZnO nanoparticle diameters are ∼5 and 10 nm, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com