Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
This paper describes a thorough investigation of the measurement of frequency band average loss factors of structural components for use in the statistical energy analysis (SEA) method of computation of vibration levels.
Similar(59)
The average loss factor is deduced from the decay curve.
In particular a formulation to calculate the average loss factor in the general case of an anisotropic component is proposed.
Moreover, the average loss factor and the loss factor under 1 T of the sample (flower-like CIPs weight content 8 wt%) are 0.36 and 0.07, which are approximately 1.71 and 2.71 times than that in the non-substitution sample.
Two alternative digital techniques for measuring modal and band averaged internal loss factors in lightly damped pipeline systems are described.
The frequency averaged coupling loss factors are calculated for weak and strong coupling, first by using a power injection method, where the power balance equations are formed on the assumption of only direct coupling loss factors.
From an ensemble study of all 150 seats, the average path loss factor,, was found to be 2.6, 3.1, and 3.2 at 1.8, 2.1 and 2.45 GHz, respectively.
These in turn are close to the arithmetic average of the loss factors of the individual modes in the band.
The ensemble averages are functions of only the ensemble averaged input power, the modal densities, the dissipation loss factors and the transmission factors for the couplings, found from travelling wave analysis.
Statistical energy analysis (SEA) parameters such as average modal spacing, coupling loss factor and input power are numerically determined for point connected, directly coupled symmetrically laminated composite plates using a modal-based approach.
The mixed model for the mean nerve thickness with ON (yes/no) as single fixed factor indicates an average loss in nerve thickness associated with a prior ON episode by −11.9 µm (95% confidence interval: −16.0 to −7.7).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com