The phrase "average leadership" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a level of leadership that is neither exceptional nor poor, often implying mediocrity in leadership qualities or effectiveness.
Example: "The team's performance improved significantly after they transitioned from average leadership to a more dynamic and inspiring approach."
Alternatives: "mediocre leadership" or "typical leadership".
A survey of high school students found that 70 percent of them have above-average leadership skills and only 2 percent are below average.
Companies that reported above-average diversity on their management teams also reported innovation revenue that was 19 points higher than that of companies with below-average leadership diversity 45% of total revenue versus just 26%.
A Boston Consulting Group (BCG) study in 2018 found that companies reporting above-average diversity on their management teams also reported innovation revenue 19 percentage points higher than that of companies with below-average leadership diversity.
Jarvis told Hatten that without his 19.9-point scoring average and leadership, the Red Storm would not have won 20 games.
Given his reported high grade-point average and leadership skills, quite a few people were shocked that he was not admitted to his choice schools.
In Detroit, the Knight Foundation focuses on "average person leadership," said Rishi Jaitly, the foundation's Detroit Program Director.
Items within each ACT concept were averaged (culture, leadership, evaluation, social capital, organizational slack-human resources, organizational slack-time, organizational slack-space) or recoded as existing or not existing and then counted (informal interactions, formal interactions, structural and electronic resources) to calculate one derived score for each factor.
They separate high-performance leaders from average ones and great leadership development programs from the merely satisfactory.
The disquieting fact in the data, however, is that in this group of high potentials 35% of the leaders were rated below average on their leadership effectiveness and 7% were rated at the 30th percentile or lower.
