The phrase "average intervention rate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the frequency or occurrence of interventions in a specific situation, such as healthcare or research studies.
Example: "The average intervention rate in the clinical trial was significantly higher than in previous studies."
Alternatives: "mean intervention frequency" or "typical intervention rate".
Using an error-correction model approach we find that on average intervention is effective in moving the real exchange rate in the desired direction, controlling for deviations from the equilibrium and short-term changes in fundamentals and global financial variables.
10 years later, the average intervention has half the effect.
These are both busy district general hospitals serving mixed urban and rural populations, with intervention rates similar to the national average.
Despite major efforts to standardize cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) interventions, average survival rate presents a large variation all over the world [ 1– 3].
For all 67 teams at district and facility levels that received the LDP intervention, the average coverage rate for selected health-service delivery indicators was 38% at baseline, 48% at endline, and 51% post intervention, showing that the teams, on average, were able to improve their measureable results and to sustain the improvements post intervention, at least for six months.
For the 18 district-level teams that received the LDP intervention, the average coverage rate for selected health indicators increased from 54% at baseline to 65% at endline, and 67% post intervention.
First, the average event rate by intervention group is a measure of the average number of events accrued per person-time.
Hypothetically, if more post-intervention data were available and readmission rates continued to decrease at the same pace, a difference between the average pre-intervention and post-intervention rates would eventually become visible (and statistically significant by means of a t test).
However, in recent studies on randomized controlled trials regarding E-health interventions, an average dropout rate of 25% was found [ 28].
In addition, there was limited participant engagement in the actual intervention with an average utilization rate of 1.7 phone calls out of 8 phone calls across the intervention group.
