The phrase "average impact factors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in academic or research contexts when discussing the typical or mean values of impact factors for journals or publications.
Example: "The study analyzed the average impact factors of various scientific journals to determine their influence in the field."
Alternatives: "mean impact factors" or "typical impact factors".
However, it should be noted that the average impact factors for anaesthesia and critical care journals, as well as those for other biomedical journals, have tended to increase over recent years for several reasons [ 10, 11].
We recorded the number of articles published each year, analyzed the publication type, and evaluated the accumulated and average impact factors (IFs), and the distribution of articles in ophthalmic journals in relation to IFs.
The results show great growth in research activity the number of articles and average impact factor has tripled since 1997.
The average impact factor was 1.11, with an index of no citation of 45%, and indexes of in-hospital, out-hospital and international collaborative studies of 57%, 19% and 4%, respectively.
The average impact factor of journals containing manually verified duplicate publications with no shared authors in Déjà vu is 1.6, whereas the average impact factor of journals indexed in PMC is 2.97 [11] [11].
The average impact factor of this select group of 47 journals was 9.74, with nearly two-thirds of all of the network papers (n = 271; 65%) published in journals at this high level.
Average impact factor scores and weighted average impact factor scores increased over the 20-year period with two notable growth periods.
Therefore, publishing in low impact factor journals was a chosen strategy and, thus, the impact factor an inadequate measure of the quality of research: " The only difference between a journal with a high impact factor and a journal with an average impact factor is the quantity of data that you add to strengthen you hypothesis.
" (Clinician-researcher, comprehensive cancer centre, 7 years of experience in cancer research) " The only difference between a journal with a high impact factor and a journal with an average impact factor is the quantity of data that you add to strengthen you hypothesis.
Scientists in this sample with low interest in faculty careers had a median of 2.5 first-author and six total publications; the journals they published in had an average impact factor of 6.1; and these scientists had a mean h-index of 4.7.
