The phrase "average functional score" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a mean value or assessment of functionality, often in fields like healthcare, education, or performance evaluation.
Example: "The average functional score of the participants improved significantly after the intervention."
Alternatives: "mean functional rating" or "typical functional score".
Average Knee Society clinical score improved from 52.9 to 95.1; average Knee Society functional score improved from 60.5 to 82.0.
Improvements compared to baseline were noted in the average ICRS functional score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and the patients' rating of the function in the affected knee compared to the contra-lateral knee.
Average function score on the MDS scale was 2.3 (SD 2.1), which corresponds to a functional status which requires limited assistance in ADL activities.
From SPORT, we obtained average functional limitation index scores based on select questions from the SF-36 and Oswestry instrument that correspond to those in the NHIS.
We found that the average functional limitation index scores based on SPORT data were comparable to the data collected at the Rothman Institute.
We obtained predicted values for earnings and missed workdays for the surgical and nonsurgical groups by using the average functional limitation index scores derived from the randomized and observational cohorts in SPORT (across 1, 2, and 4 years posttreatment) and the results of the regression models [ 27].
This threshold was chosen after observing that, for all methods, the averaged functional similarity scores increases above this value.
For instance, the medium-SES group is on average 1.032 lower in the physical functional score than the lowest-SES group, and the highest-SES group is on average 1.512 lower in the physical functional score than the lowest-SES group.
The average age, height, weight, self-reported functional score, pre-treatment pain rating, post-treatment pain rating, and involved side to uninvolved side strength deficit is reported according to each respective treatment group in Table 1.
All patients subjectively reported good or excellent outcomes with a final average Harris Hip Score of 88.7, Knee Society objective and functional score of 92.0.
