The phrase "average functional and" is not complete and lacks context, making it difficult to assess its correctness in written English.
It could potentially be used in a context discussing average functionality in a specific field or subject, but it needs additional information to clarify its meaning.
Example: "The average functional and operational efficiency of the machines in this factory is impressive."
Alternatives: "typical functional and" or "standard functional and".
This underlines that mandible shape evolved under an average functional regime and that in that regime, the complex of jaw bone, masticatory muscles, teeth, and even behaviour, evolved as a co-adapted system.
This is a major advantage over standard fixed tests, such as the HAQ, which are usually most precise for patients of average functional capacity, and decreasingly less precise for those with more extreme test scores.
In all 3 groups, the average knee score (KSS), the average functional score (FS), and the range of motion had increased at the 2-year follow-up and remained similar at the 5-year follow-up (Table 2).
The statistical performances of the designed controllers such as best, mean, standard deviations of IAE and average functional evaluations for 20 independent trials.
Column "avg_yeast" and "avg_fly" refer to the average functional similarity of conserved yeast protein complexes and conserved fly protein complexes respectively when comparing yeast against fly.
We found that both the average expression homogeneity and the average functional homogeneity did not change by more than 3% across this parameter range.
The average expression homogeneity and the average functional homogeneity of the produced JACSs (computed as described in [ 1]) of the JACSs did not change by more than 6%.
In a similar manner, we generated another 10,000 negative control sets and calculated the average functional relatedness for each set containing 1,252 microRNA pairs randomly sampled from the microRNA network.
The average functional similarity of mapped clusters is 0.33, and 23% of the pairs of mapped clusters have average functional similarity >0.5.
The exercises started below the average functional capacity assessed during the first session and were increased gradually during the course of the intervention, according to the time-contingency principle.
