The phrase "average fluorescence intensity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or technical contexts, particularly in fields like biology, chemistry, or physics, where measurements of fluorescence are relevant.
Example: "The average fluorescence intensity of the samples was measured to determine the concentration of the dye."
Alternatives: "mean fluorescence intensity" or "typical fluorescence intensity".
The parameters measured with the cytometer were the number of fluorescent cells and average fluorescence intensity [ 55].
AFI = average fluorescence intensity.
ΔΨm was found to be 4286 ± 2365 (average fluorescence intensity) 4917 ± 2508 (average fluorescence intensity) (mean ± SD, n = 4), at day 14 and 72 hours later, respectively.
Quantitative measurements of average fluorescence intensity were captured for all parameters and exported for data analysis.
ER integrity was found to be 357 ± 166 (average fluorescence intensity) and 489 ± 330 (average fluorescence intensity) (mean ± SD, n = 4), at day 14 and 72 hours later, respectively.
Bars represent the average fluorescence intensity of the different antibodies that showed positive detection from 2 experimental replicates per lagoon and 6 replicate spots per antibody.
(a d) Time course images (a,b) and change of average fluorescence intensity (c,d) of GFP signals in single isolated leaf cells.
Average intracellular Ca2+ levels were quantified as the change in average fluorescence intensity at different time points above the initial fluorescence (ΔF = F − Fo) divided by the initial intensity (Fo).
The intensity of a large number of single unenhanced LH2s was recorded (example traces Fig. 2c,e) to obtain the average fluorescence intensity of a single complex for a given excitation power (see Methods section).
Comparison of (A) Cellular viability (ATP depletion), (B) ER integrity or (C) ΔΨm average fluorescence intensity at Day 14 + 24 hours versus Day 14 + 72 hours in cardiac microtissues (n ≥ 20 on >3 independent cardiac microtissue preparations, mean ± SD).
(a d) Time course images (a,b) and changes of average fluorescence intensity (c,d) of GFP signals in isolated adjacent cells in RM09 #35 (a,c) and RM55 #69 (b,d) lines, respectively.
