The phrase "average expression intensity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as scientific research, data analysis, or discussions about measurements in various fields, particularly in biology or statistics.
Example: "The study measured the average expression intensity of the genes across different conditions to determine their activity levels."
Alternatives: "mean expression level" or "typical expression strength".
cDNAs with average expression intensity across all 47 arrays <300 or absent from >1 array were excluded from the analysis.
cDNAs with average expression intensity across all arrays in a species set <300 or absent from >1 array were excluded from the analysis.
An additional expression abundance filter was applied to three of the data sets; probe set differences were considered significant only if the average expression intensity was above 250.
Probe sets were considered to have changed qualitatively in a specific comparison if an adjusted P-value of 0.05 was obtained, both their average expression intensity was above 250 and they had a fold change greater than 1.3.
The average expression intensity of KLRG1 was two times greater in the H group than in the L group for CD4-/CD8+, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80% and an AUC of 0.87.
Average expression intensity of the cluster 4 genes was much higher than that of the cluster 1 genes and there was uniformity in the expression of the cluster 4 genes.
To rule out this possibility, we calculated the average expression intensities of human genes in 79 tissues [ 21].
(2) Low expression difference filter: | E - B| > [AvBg + 3* σ Bg)] = 38, where E and B are average expression intensities in tumor and normal groups, respectively; AvBg is the average background value for all profiles in tumor and normal groups; and σ Bg) is standard deviation of background values for all profiles in tumor and normal groups.
Second, when a variety of normalizations were employed, specifically the four normalization algorithms MAS5, LiWong [ 24], RMA [ 22] and gc-RMA [ 25], the MAS5 values were, in fact, closest to the averages obtained from taking the mean expression intensity of the four normalization results.
Normalized fold intensities were calculated for reasons of comparison from the normalized signal intensities divided by the average of the normalized signal intensities of the three organs (mean expression intensity).
The average gene expression intensity in all germline tissues is also significantly correlated with promoter CpGO/E (ρ = 0.37, P <10-15 <10-15
