Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(56)
Average errors of less than 12% on thermal power are obtained for the entire cycle.
Measurements indicate that the BPNN model simulates GMAW process with average errors of 0.33 to 0.82%.
The average errors of the OBC methods were smaller than that of the HCT method.
The average errors of the approximate solutions is less than 0.9% for the cases simulated in this paper.
Finally, a semiellipse-shaped workpiece, with average errors of +0.61/−0.62 mm, is manufactured with the optimized adjustment process.
The model validation has shown satisfactory accuracy with maximum and average errors of 12% and 4%, respectively.
The results show the average errors of 0.106%, 0.093% and 7.18×10−5% using MLP, RBF and ANFIS, respectively.
Similar(4)
The SLH correlation yielded an average error of 23%.
The average error of road identification is 16.2%.
The group's prediction will have less error than the average error of its individual members.
Comparison with ground truth revealed an average error of 3.3° while walking straight segments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com