Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(40)
Average error was sub-pixel level for y axis on vision coordinate.
The average error was about 7%, which shows the presented model has an acceptable validity.
The average error was calculated for all 18 isotherms with each of the models evaluated.
The pass-to-pass average error was 0.90 m, being under 0.662 m in 95% of the detected passes.
A comparison of the results from the adjusted penetration-based equation and the actual experiment showed that the average error was 26%.
In the first model (power equation) the average error obtained was 3.7% and in the second model (specific energy) the average error was 6.8%.
Similar(20)
The average error is only 0.71%.
In experiments with the DSP system, the average error is 26%.
The average error is less than 1 °C for unsteady test conditions.
The maximum ranging error is 3.24 m, the minimum ranging error is 0.26 m and the average error is less than 0.46 m.
When the modulus of the wave is less than 0.95, the maximum error and absolute average error are acceptable for engineering.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com