Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Average end-to-end delay.
(c) Average end-to-end delay comparison.
(b) Average end-to-end delay comparison.
Figure 8 Average end-to-end delay.
Fig. 5 Average end-to-end delay vs. node mobility.
Figure 11 Experiment B - average end-to-end delay.
Figure 7 Experiment A - average end-to-end delay.
Generally, the average delay using Figzy AODV gives a better end-to-end delay performance than traditional AODV and MBCR.
Figure 11 Performance comparison (w.r.t. Average end-to-end delay).
a Average end-to-end delay for different network scales, b Average end-to-end delay for different traffic rates.
The average application dose of the end effector ranged from 21.89 mg to 56.18 mg per target, with a coefficient of variation (CV) range of 33.79 60.85%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com