The phrase "average employment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing typical levels of employment within a specific context, such as economic reports or labor statistics.
Example: "The report indicated that the average employment rate in the region has increased over the past year."
Alternatives: "typical employment" or "mean employment level".
And the average employment change per company is zero, the group said.
Since 1994, annual average employment growth has been a remarkable 4%, far higher than almost any OECD country.
Average employment rates in Denmark remain higher than in the United States and other countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The employment report noted that despite the average employment rate being within touching distance of its pre-crisis level, that masked an uneven recovery and "unemployment remains much too high in a considerable number of European OECD countries".
Since July, the institute's index has suggested average employment growth about 175,000 jobs higher than has actually been the case, according to Joseph Abate, an economist at Lehman Brothers.
The most recent government figures, for 2011-2012, show that the average employment income for single-parent households was £110 a week, compared with £390 for all UK households.
Measured by how many full-time jobs those hours would add up to, the average employment gap between men and women in the OECD widens to around a third.
From the beginning of the financial crisis in 2008 to 2010, the average employment rate of recent European graduates 20 to 34 years old dropped 4.5 percent, according to data from the European Commission.
Yet the average employment rate is a little higher than the first group's and the unemployment rate a little lower.There are two reasons why the second group can match the first.
American firms that survive double their employment over the first two years, on average; employment gains among new firms in Europe are only 10-20% (see bottom chart).How might this reflect differences in market regulation?
At a time when American unemployment is stuck at a worryingly high level, this has made private-equity firms a target for anger from both Republicans and Democrats.Yet the direct employment losses that result from private-equity deals are not as large as critics claim: on average employment declines by only 1% two years after a buy-out, once the jobs created at new facilities are counted.
