The phrase "average efficacy of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the typical effectiveness or performance of a treatment, intervention, or method in a specific context.
Example: "The researchers measured the average efficacy of the new drug compared to the standard treatment."
Alternatives: "mean effectiveness of" or "typical efficacy of".
In order to capture the consumed diesel oil in the process of excavation and transport, the diesel oil consumption is converted into equivalent EC according to the average efficacy of diesel generator.
Especially for strategies aimed at improving the average efficacy of a vaccine, the gains from mixing several immunogens are relatively small and are similar to the gains obtained by increasing immunogenicity by approximately 3 to 5 fold.
At the PHO5-HO locus, the two DNA sequences immediately flanking the induced HO cleavage site and represented by amplicons F to I, were captured with an average efficacy of 10.3% over total DNA (before immunoprecipitation) representing a 10-fold enrichment over the amplicons E and J not harboring the HO site (Figure 5b).
Effectiveness is defined as the probability of preventing HIV-1 transmission per sex-act through PrEP and is given by the product of the average efficacy of PrEP, ξ (the degree of protection provided, from HIV-1 transmission per sex-act) and the average level of adherence to PrEP, θ (assuming once daily dosing and that doses are missed at random).
Effectiveness is defined as the probability of preventing HIV transmission per sex-act through PrEP and is given by the product of the average efficacy of PrEP, ξ (the degree of protection provided, from HIV transmission per sex-act) and the average level of adherence to PrEP, θ (assuming once daily dosing of a single antiretroviral drug and that doses are missed at random).
Using a 7 2 DNA:FuGene mix, we reached an average efficacy of 24.9%.
Therefore, the linezolid and vancomycin results were pooled, and a weighted average efficacy rate of 89.5% was utilized.
Furthermore, even the most carefully considered set of guidelines is based on averages average A1C-lowering effect, average efficacy, average risk of adverse effects without adequate consideration of the confidence intervals around those averages.
The gains by mixing two or three immunogen are relatively modest: For example for a single immunogen vaccine that gives an average efficacy in the population of 50% and has a fold range of 65 fold, adding a second similar immunogen would increase the overall efficacy to 75%.
The impact of a vaccine will depend not only on average efficacy, but also on the extent of heterogeneity of the host response including its duration.
The actual VMCCI attack rate in placebo recipients in Season 1 was close to our prediction, but in Season 2 the attack rate was less than half of that predicted, and this had a large negative impact on the precision of the average efficacy estimate.
