Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
We found low to no correlation between average discussion time and APS, ΔPS, and ΔA, even with teleconference reviews having shorter discussion times on average.
The same is true for common |ΔA| versus average discussion time (R=0.06 (p=0.52) and R=0.32 (p=0.14) for face-to-face and teleconference settings, respectively).
The same was found when plotting average discussion time versus common APS for both settings (R<0.01; p=0.81 for face-to-face; R<0.01; p=0.77 for teleconference) (data not shown).
When grouping by common |ΔPS| and comparing to average discussion time, no correlation was found for either the face-to-face (R<0.01; p=0.89) or the teleconference (R=0.02; p=0.58) setting.
Grouping by common ΔA EODD) and plotting against average discussion time yielded low levels of correlation for both settings (R=0.19 (p=0.10) and R=0.22 (p=0.11) for face-to-face and teleconference settings, respectively) (figures 3A, B).
Similar(55)
The average panel discussion time per application was 23.9±0.7 min (face-to-face) and 20.0±0.7 min (teleconference).
Further, this demonstrates that, though teleconferences have shorter discussion times on average, overall discussion time does not seem to be an important difference between settings when it comes to application scoring.
(Surgeon D08) At each observed MDT meeting participants adopted a pace and style that enabled them to get through all the patients on the agenda within the time allocated for the meeting, with average presentation and discussion time per patient ranging from 2.4 min in one breast cancer MDT meeting to 5.6 min in a colorectal meeting.
The average treatment time is 23 months.
Even better, our discussion time was limited.
Discussion time was the total time in seconds elapsed during a single patient discussion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com