The phrase "average coverage in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the typical extent or level of coverage in a specific context, such as media, insurance, or research.
Example: "The average coverage in the study revealed significant disparities among different demographics."
Alternatives: "typical coverage in" or "mean coverage in".
On average coverage in New York costs about twice the national average and three times what it costs in states like California that have relatively few restrictions on underwriting.
In particular, the 5mers AAAAA/TTTTT, proposed to be a nucleosome exclusion signal [38], have the lowest average coverage in all three data sets.
These two factors combined lead to higher average coverage in the SureSelect libraries despite the downsampling of the number of sequence reads in the SureSelect libraries to equal those in the Nimblegen libraries in the beginning of the analysis.
For coverage along the same mtDNA, we observed a significant increase in the average coverage per base within the regions where the PCR fragments overlap (mean = 1,947, SD = 991) compared to the average coverage in non-overlapping regions (mean = 1,072, SD = 543), p<0.0001.
Incentives had a significant effect in increasing average coverage in exposed PCTs (0.43%, CI 0.04%-0.82%-0.82%
A comparison with the average coverage in the genome (7) gives an average number of copies per annotation of 2.2.
In this experiment, rpsblast achieved an averaged coverage in the range of 85.6 98.6% (84.7 95.5%) compared with hmmsearch using trusted (noise) cutoffs.
To do this, we computed the average coverage level in each 1 kb bin in the 590 reference genomes, after scaling each genome to the geometric average of total autosomal coverage, stratified by G + C content.
Two values are reported for the alignments of each method: average coverage (aC in %), and average rmsd (aR in Å).
Additional file 9 shows the expected logarithmic correlation between the Ct observed in qRT-PCR and the average coverage observed in RNA-Seq for each gene.
Of the shared transcripts, 1,247 transcripts showed a more than 3-fold difference in average coverage (499 enhanced in small intestine vs. 748 in colon).
