Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Concerning the second question, results showed an average concordance with a Kappa coefficient of 0.63: 22 discordances were noted highlighting the major problem of 'oligoclonal' definition.
Similar(59)
Fair concordance with our reported data is achieved.
The average genotype call rate for the SNPs genotyped with TaqMan was 99.04%, and the average concordance rate with GWAS data among the LLS GWAS cases was 100%.
The average genotype call rate for SNPs genotyped with Sequenom was 98.40%, and the average concordance rate with GWAS data among the LLS GWAS cases was 99.97%.
Blind duplicate samples were included in both GWAS (n = 39) and Exome (n = 58) with average concordance rates of 99.0 ± 0.72% (mean ± SD) and 99.9 ± 0.0001%, respectively.
In contrast, comparisons between the WKY/NCrl rats and the WKY/NHsd rat (UK or US) indicated a much greater than expected degree of divergence, with average concordance rates of 66.5%.
The automatically traced centerlines were manually validated on six image stacks and the average spatial error was measured to be 2 pixels, with an average concordance of 81% between manual and automated traces on a voxel basis.
triPOD detected all of the previously reported abnormalities with an average concordance of 99.9%.
After correcting sequence genotypes with Beagle, average concordance increased to 98.3%% (range: 74.1 99.9 %).
This yielded a 13-variable model with an average concordance value of 0.673.
Comparing ALCHEMY genotype calls on these samples to the Perlegen sequence confirms this with an average concordance of 96.5% (see Supplementary Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com