The phrase "average concordance rate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as statistics, research, or data analysis to describe the typical level of agreement between two or more sets of data or measurements.
Example: "In our study, we found that the average concordance rate between the two diagnostic tests was 85%, indicating a high level of agreement."
Alternatives: "mean concordance rate" or "typical concordance rate".
Thus, in the set of 16 SNPs, we observed an average concordance rate of 98.7% of genotype calls using 3.3% replicates.
Although the average concordance rate among the radiologists was reasonably good as reported by the OFA (74%), including the radiologist in the model would improve the accuracy.
Relative genotype concordance was calculated as follows: In each S-WGA array data set, genotype concordance rate was calculated by chromosome, and then concordance rates were divided by the average concordance rate (similar to per-chip normalization).
The average concordance rate between the QC samples was 99.8%.
The average concordance rate for genotyping in validation was 99.8%.
Comparison of the two DNA sources from each individual showed an average concordance rate of 95.69%.
Blind duplicate samples were included in both GWAS (n = 39) and Exome (n = 58) with average concordance rates of 99.0 ± 0.72% (mean ± SD) and 99.9 ± 0.0001%, respectively.
In contrast, comparisons between the WKY/NCrl rats and the WKY/NHsd rat (UK or US) indicated a much greater than expected degree of divergence, with average concordance rates of 66.5%.
Indels with quality scores greater than 150 were included in the study, resulting in an average genotype concordance rate of 97.14%, although an average 63.07% of indels originally identified by Complete Genomics were excluded.
On the basis of data from the pilot study, 40 we used a mean of 22 eligible patients per month per centre, an average intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.04, and an average baseline concordance rate of 60% for all four cardiac rehabilitation treatments as estimators in the sample size calculation.
When probe detection concordance rates (Detection p-value <0.01) were calculated between replicates, a high degree of overlap was obtained, with an average probe concordance rate of 94.6%.
