The phrase "average challenge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a task or situation that is neither too easy nor too difficult, representing a typical level of difficulty.
Example: "The exam presented an average challenge, allowing most students to demonstrate their understanding of the material."
Alternatives: "moderate challenge" or "typical challenge".
Figure 4 shows the challenge profiles of the two clusters the average challenge profile for the similar group of 14 students and one outlier, a single student who seemed to face many more challenges than the rest of the students.
These converted counts were used to determine the average challenge level delivered to the test samples.
In this work I have assumed that each network confers an average phenotype during the individual's life that either meets or does not meet the average challenge presented by the environment.
Following challenge, 10 of 11 (91%) control cats developed persistent antigenemia (average challenge phase OD, 0.726).
No cats (0 of 11) in the Nobivac feline 2-FeLV group became persistently viremic (average challenge phase OD, 0.047).
The companies are ranked in five categories: "Genius," "Gifted," "Average," "Challenged" and "Feeble". Cartier, Tiffany and Bulgari all earned the Genius ranking, achieving a minimum score of 140 points.
All else must follow (2)." Mother Nature has decreed that we must have extra function not for the daily average challenges but to survive the assaults that intermittently threaten our very survival.
But the lead-up to these Olympics was fraught with above-average challenges: an economic downturn in Britain that made cost-cutting a leitmotif for the new Conservative government; rioting last summer that shook London's sense of well-being and only contributed to the fast-climbing security budget for the Games themselves.
δ average item challenge, SE standard error of the item challenge, Infit infit mean square statistic, Oufit outfit mean square statistic aThe original item 9 was reversed in these analyses Note.
The person-item threshold distribution (Fig. 2) portrayed that the average item challenge was slightly lower than the average person intensity, but from the information curve it is clear that there was substantial information available for the majority of respondents.
The person-item threshold distribution (Fig. 2) suggested improved targeting for MLQ-S 1233456, but for MLQ-S 1223345 (not shown) the average item challenge level was found to be more than the average person intensity level, which suggests less optimal targeting.
