The phrase "average cell viability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or research contexts, particularly in biology or pharmacology, to refer to the typical percentage of living cells in a sample after treatment or exposure to a substance.
Example: "The results indicated an average cell viability of 75% after 24 hours of treatment with the drug."
Alternatives: "mean cell viability" or "typical cell viability".
However, when the static field is turned on, the average cell viability slightly decreased until a value of ~92% for bare SPION and ~91% for PEG-SPION.
In Figure 4, the cell viability shows the average cell viability of four tests, while the error bars show the standard deviations.
Measurements of in vitro cytotoxicity in A549 cells revealed that the passivated nanoparticles had a lower cytotoxicity (>65% in average cell viability, counter-flow) than the untreated model nanoparticles.
Moreover, the co-flow incorporation between the nanoparticles and chitosan induced passivation of the nanoparticles, and the average cell viability increased by >80% compared to the model welding nanoparticles.
As a more convenient way (additional chitosan generation and incorporation devices may not be required), other passivation strategies through a modification of the welding rod with chitosan adhesive and graphite paste did also enhance average cell viability (>58%).
However, when the iron concentration was further increased (>2.5 mM and up to 10 mM), the average cell viability decreased in 20 50% of its initial value, which could have been induced by slow apoptotic cell death because of the cell membrane damage and acute cell injury that occurs when the nanoparticle clusters are in close proximity to the cell membrane.
The average difference between cell viability data for single agent mitoxantrone is 12.9% between the two methods, while the average difference is 15% for the mitoxantrone-TRAIL combinations.
The results are presented as average percentage of cell viability to that of the negative control.
Calculation of average increase in cell viability showed that Nec-1 caused 74.2%% recovery in diquat (100 µM -treated cells.
The average percentage of cell viability after exposure to the extracts of RelyX Temp E, Provicol, PreVISION CEM, and RelyX Temp NE was 89.1%, 84.9%, 92.3%, and 66.8%, respectively.
However, as shown in Figure S4 in Additional file 4, the average cell volumes and viabilities of the cell lines incubated with RCA-I at the same concentrations as that used in the cell motility assays were not changed appreciably by the presence of RCA-I.
