The phrase "average bone volume" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to biology, medicine, or anatomy when discussing the typical amount of bone tissue in a given sample or population.
Example: "The study found that the average bone volume in the participants was significantly lower than expected for their age group."
Alternatives: "mean bone volume" or "typical bone volume".
MP-Dry had a more homogeneous bone distribution than MP-Wet, although the average bone volume fraction, ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯BVF, was not significantly different for these two groups (0.45 ± 0.03 and 0.37 ± 0.03, respectively).
Micro-CT evaluation conducted after 1, 6, and 12 weeks of implantation shows the least amount of average bone volume on the un-implanted Ti pin, whereas that on the C N implanted sample is more than that on the C-implanted at every time point.
Similar trends were observed when the average bone volume of humeri and tibias were compared between the control and mice with CIA.
The degree of bone destruction was determined as percentage difference between the average bone volumes in experimental groups compared with those in the appropriate control cohorts.
In the 9-month group, the average vital bone volume was 35.2% of the total biopsy volume (SD ±9.5) of which 8.8% (SD ±3.8) was osteoid.
In the total area for the 12-month group, the average vital bone volume was 28.2% of the total biopsy volume (SD ±3.2) of which 3.4% (SD ±2.5) was osteoid.
The average increase in subchondral bone volume from 3 to 6 month was 36%% and the average bone deficit after 6 month was only 0.06 cm3 (SD ± 0.04) compared with the native subchondral bone level.
Bone volume averaged 68.6% in the autologous group).
MRI (one cohort, five cross-sectional studies): one prospective cohort, unadjusted, below-average-quality analysis reported increasing bone volume fraction, trabecular number and thickness and decreasing trabecular spacing were associated with structural progression [ 53].
The percentage bone volume showed an average increase of 45%, which was not statistically significant because of one outlier.
The bone volume fraction and average tissue mineral density, or the degree of mineralization, were calculated for the entire core (subchondral plate and subchondral trabecular bone).
