Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "average background intensity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to measurements, data analysis, or scientific discussions where background intensity is being quantified or compared.
Example: "The average background intensity of the signal was measured to ensure accurate results in the experiment."
Alternatives: "mean background level" or "typical background intensity".
Exact(28)
As long as the light sheet was stable, the excitation light was enhanced ~ 8 times compared to the average background intensity.
On these samples, the intensity within the region of interest (ROI) could be enhanced 12 to 15 times compared to the average background intensity.
Both Hybrid Recon and Flash 3D showed an area in the background in which the intensity is higher than the average background intensity.
The average background intensity did not differ between genotypes.
These values were used to calculate the average background intensity for the multi-zone layer.
Average background intensity was subtracted from average signal intensity within the circle to give the final intensity of the aster.
Similar(32)
Average background intensities were calculated from designated background and address only beads.
A variation to this approach has been the use of an adaptive threshold where nematode intensities, or appearance, are assumed to significantly differ from the average background intensities [27], [33], [34].
The local background intensities of all individual genes were subsequently averaged, resulting in the mean background intensity of a particular membrane.
Quality filters based upon combined calls and signal intensities (test and/or control signal intensity was required to be greater than the average background signal intensity of 27) were used in the worksheet to further evaluate individual gene comparisons.
The fluorescence intensity inside each nucleus and the average background fluorescence intensity were determined for both the YFP/GFP and TRITC channels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com