average age of subjects

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "average age of subjects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research studies, surveys, or any situation where you need to refer to the mean age of participants involved in a study or experiment. Example: "The average age of subjects in the clinical trial was 45 years."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

Average age of subjects was 61 yr.

Duke University

Average age of subjects was 35.9 +/− 9 years and 56% were female.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The average age of subjects in the microarray experiment was 66 years (range 48 to 76 years).

Plosone

The average age of subjects with Alzheimer's disease was 85 years (range 75 to 92 years) and 91.8 years (90 to 95 years) for controls.

Plosone

The average age of subjects was 11.7 ± 4.4 years old.

BMC Gastroenterology

The average age of subjects in this group was 41.2 years.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

A total of 1,404,470 AEs from 832 drugs were analyzed as a function of reports of suicidal ideations; other non-suicidal adverse reactions; drug class; proportion of reports from males; and average age of subject for which AE was filed.

Plosone

Owings et al [ 19] demonstrated the greatest discrepancy in age across groups, with the mean age of subjects on average ten years older than the control group.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

No significance was observed between the publication groups for subspecialty within pediatrics, geographic region of corresponding author, number of centers, number of subjects/trials, minimum age of entry of subjects, and average age of entry of subjects.

BMC Pediatrics

The higher average age of the subjects in the study carried out by Penninx et al. [ 16], and the different sample selection, may justify the contrasting results.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

The average age of the subjects of this study (37 years) was within the range of the previous studies in medical or emergency settings 26-42 yearss) [ 5, 6, 26, 28- 33].

BMC Psychiatry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting the "average age of subjects", always include the standard deviation or range to provide a more complete picture of the age distribution within the study population.

Common error

Avoid reporting only the "average age of subjects" without providing a measure of variability, such as standard deviation or range. This can misrepresent the age distribution and obscure important details about the sample.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "average age of subjects" functions as a noun phrase that commonly acts as a subject or object in sentences, particularly in scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use in conveying a key demographic characteristic of a study's participants.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

85%

Academia

7%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "average age of subjects" is a common and grammatically correct term used primarily in scientific and academic contexts to denote the mean age of participants in a study. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is accurate and widely used. When using this phrase, it's best practice to also include measures of variability like standard deviation or range to provide a more complete picture of the age distribution. Alternative phrases include "mean age of participants" or "typical age of subjects". The phrase's frequency is classified as "common", appearing most often in science-related articles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mean age of participants

Replaces "average" with "mean", offering a statistical synonym and "subjects" with participants.

typical age of subjects

Substitutes "average" with "typical", emphasizing a representative age.

median age of subjects

Uses "median" instead of "average", focusing on the midpoint of the age distribution.

subject's average age

Changes the word order, emphasizing "subject" first.

average subject age

Rearranges the phrase for brevity, placing "subject" before "age".

average age of the study group

Specifies "study group" instead of "subjects", providing more context.

mean age of the cohort

Replaces "subjects" with "cohort", referring to a group of people.

the subjects' average age

Uses a possessive form to indicate the subjects' shared average age.

average age within the sample population

Replaces "subjects" with "sample population", providing a more specific term.

age average of subjects

Inverts the order to emphasize "age", with a slight shift in naturalness.

FAQs

What does "average age of subjects" mean in research?

In research, the phrase "average age of subjects" refers to the mean age of the participants involved in a particular study or experiment. It's a measure of central tendency that summarizes the typical age of the study's participants.

How do I properly report the "average age of subjects" in a research paper?

When reporting the "average age of subjects", include the mean (average) age along with a measure of variability, such as the standard deviation (e.g., "average age of subjects" was 35.5 ± 7.2 years) or the range (e.g., "average age of subjects" was 35.5 years, range 22-50 years). This provides a more complete description of the age distribution.

What are some alternative ways to say "average age of subjects"?

You can use alternatives like "mean age of participants", "typical age of subjects", or "median age of subjects" depending on the context and the specific measure of central tendency you want to emphasize.

Why is it important to report the "average age of subjects" in a study?

Reporting the "average age of subjects" is important because age can be a significant factor in many research areas. Knowing the age distribution of the participants helps in interpreting the results and assessing the generalizability of the findings to other populations.