Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
In case of an unknown State-of-Charge, this novel method estimates the temperature with an average absolute bias of 0.4°C and an average standard deviation of 0.7°C using a single impedance measurement for the battery under consideration.
Estimates of wt contamination obtained in repeated analyses (DNA extraction and PCR) of the same validation samples showed CV values ranging from 3.1 to 19.0% and were quite close to the expected values, with average absolute bias for each level lower than 25%, except for the 1% validation samples (bias 29%) (Table 1).
Similar(58)
Mean bias as well as mean absolute bias was calculated.
6 Mean standardized percent absolute bias is the mean absolute bias of the percent difference of the sample means in the treated and non-treated sub-samples as a percentage of the square root of the average of the sample variances in the treated and non-treated groups [34].
The mean absolute bias was 17%, 24%, and 9% for cases 1 to 3, respectively.
Mean absolute bias for CI was 0.77 L/min/m2 (18%) with an unacceptable PE of 62%.
The models herein presented have demonstrated, within the test group used to lead to very low average absolute and bias errors.
On average, the absolute bias that is corrected in odds ratios for each approach/method dyad was as follows: Approach A/RCAL (|Δ bias| = 0.12); Approach A/SIMEX (|Δ bias| = 0.06); Approach B/RCAL (|Δ bias| = 0.08); Approach B/SIMEX (|Δ bias| = 0.06).
Six statistical indicators (e.g., percent relative error, maximum absolute percent relative error, average absolute percent relative errors, percent bias, index of agreement, and Nash Sutcliffe efficiency) and relative computer computation time are used for assessing the model performance.
As expected, the most temporally stable location (MTSL1) accurately predicted the average SWS of the corresponding soil layer, and the values of absolute bias relative to mean (ARB) were lower than 3% for all of the investigated soil layers.
Using the recession constant estimated from the ABIT method performs noticeably better than using the default parameter, indicated by the absolute bias reduced about 20% in average.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com