The phrase "available weighted" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe something that is weighted and available, but without additional context, it is ambiguous.
Example: "The available weighted options for the project need to be reviewed before making a decision."
Alternatives: "accessible weighted" or "offered weighted".
Five facilitators were each endorsed as influential by at least two patients and were assigned almost 67%% of the available weighted votes.
Where data from multiple registries per country were available, weighted averages were calculated to derive country-specific estimates for the proportion of ADC cases.
Commercially available weighted pulley systems will be used as the resistance for the leg press and seated straight knee calf press with a weight range 7 250 kg.
As a group, the six facilitators were assigned 29 (69.1 %) of the 42 available weighted votes (Fig. 1b; see Additional file 2 for more details).
At least two patients endorsed each of four facilitators as influential and assigned almost 42%% of available weighted votes to them (Fig. 3a; see Additional file 7 for more details).
This suggests that whenever subject-level covariates are available, weighted quantile normalization should be used because it is at least as good as conventional quantile normalization (in terms of power and FDR control), but substantially better in the presence of relevant demographic or environmental factors.
N/A – not available, $ – weighted mean calculated from categories.
For time periods where more than one survey was available, a weighted average of the different surveys was used.
When any subject-level covariates are available, the weighted quantile normalization method should be used over the conventional quantile normalization method.
Both that reannotation and the currently reported gene model refinement made extensive use of EVidenceModeler (EVM), an automated tool that reports eukaryotic gene structures as a consensus of all available evidence, weighted according to the form of evidence [ 33].
In 2013 a workgroup consisting of ACMG, AMP, and CAP members, representing clinical laboratory directors and clinicians, was formed with the goal of developing a recommendation for the use of standard terminology for classifying sequence variants using available evidence weighted according to a system developed through expert opinion, workgroup consensus and community input.
