The phrase "available evaluations" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to assessments or reviews that are accessible for consideration or analysis.
Example: "Before making a decision, please review the available evaluations of the product."
Alternatives: "accessible assessments" or "open reviews".
However, the available evaluations show that arterial roads can result in positive environmental effects, such as the reduction of noise and air pollution [14, 36].
This survey took into account already available evaluations regarding certain quality attributes, such as performance [51, 54], consistency [43] or durability [26].
The reviewed materials cover more or less readily available evaluations that met minimum standards.
The available evaluations indicate that it has successfully encouraged pharmaceutical innovation and offers a robust model of how public policy can stimulate research and development when candidate technologies are otherwise likely to generate inadequate private returns.
While the utility of such web-crawling systems has been well established (2, 7, 11– 13), there are no publicly available evaluations quantifying the limits of news-based epidemic intelligence based on external factors and only one study descriptively examines potential limitations (14).
There are two possibilities to deal with this problem: The first is to identify compounds of the mixture affecting the same health endpoint on the basis of available evaluations, to relate exposure to generic ADIs instead of endpoint specific limit values, and then sum up the ratios to derive the index value.
A wide variety of existing available evaluation methods and the influence factors are used for this evaluation.
Currently available evaluation methods rely on the definition of treatment and control groups independently of the outcome of interest.
The purpose of this study was to assess the advantages and limitations of three available evaluation methods.
Although the usefulness of the speech mixer for a multi-seat conference is easy to see, there are no readily available evaluation methods for the mixer.
Besides an assessment of the methodological quality of available evaluation results, the present paper focuses on a quantitative, meta-analytical synthesis of this empirical evidence.
