The phrase "available a feature of" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "available as a feature of"? You can use the corrected phrase when discussing the accessibility or inclusion of a specific feature in a product or service.
Example: "The new software update includes several enhancements, with dark mode available as a feature of the user interface."
Alternatives: "offered as a feature of" or "included as a feature of".
At the same time, a predictable closed-loop behavior is guaranteed by making use of a batch of available data, which is a feature of off-line algorithms.
Update: As some commenters point out, these Google Offers look very similar to Google Coupons that have been available to local businesses as a feature of Google Places for a long time.
We developed Sample-based LIMS (SLIMS) to make available a feature-rich system capable of handling longitudinal data and to increase the presence of user-centric design in LIMSs.
The new mobile apps allow users to upload and download files to ZumoDrive directly from their smartphones, which was not available as a feature in the previous versions of the applications.
First, this is a rather late available, high level feature of characters, making it a more difficult and time consuming selection criterion than for instance spatial frequency or color [40], [41].
The much-hyped Wayne Hemingway-designed Beachmbe Beach Pods in Bournemouth are now available for hire, with a feature wall of coast-themed art, beach furniture and kitted-out kitchens (though no water supply).
Since new data may become available over time, an important feature of an ADS is the ability to accommodate newly acquired data incrementally, after it has originally been trained and deployed for operations.
QuickGO is updated weekly with GO annotations and nightly with GO term information making it one of the most up-to-date GO browsers available, this is a critical feature of GO browsers, and GO analysis tools in general, due to the constant growth and updating of both the ontology and annotations.
In the situation that such a split is not available, a random assignment of features into two sets still performs better than using only one feature set.
Using this linear measure of the relative utility of features makes available a wide range of cost-benefit analyses and decision theoretic techniques, allowing the study of whether or not to use many different kinds of representational information or tagging systems, and for the design of indexing and metadata systems.
