The phrase "autonomy of science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the independence and self-governing nature of scientific inquiry and research.
Example: "The autonomy of science is essential for fostering innovation and unbiased research outcomes."
Alternatives: "independence of science" or "self-governance of science".
"We feel outrageously offended and interpret Moratti's act as anticonstitutional, since it is against the autonomy of science," he summarises.
This is a mandate which justifies the relative autonomy of science – a sort of macro-protected space.
First, at a descriptive level, it is clear that autonomy of science often fails in practice due to the presence of external interests, e.g., funding agencies and industry lobbies.
In the initial chapter Schutz praised Max Weber's views on value-freedom in social science and the autonomy of science vis-à-vis other activities (e.g. politics), and he commended Weber's methodological individualism and ideal-type methodology.
Prudential acquiescence can actually be counteracted by a vision of progress through science which has served as a mandate for the autonomy of science, but could also lead scientists to become active in the wider world, as an embodied force of progress.
As has been mentioned, he did not by any means intend his championing of the cause of intellectual conscience in insisting on the autonomy of natural science and interpretation to undermine religion in general or Christianity in particular; on the contrary, his hope and expectation was that both sorts of autonomy would in the end support religion and Christianity.
For Collingwood, understanding the difference between truth and meaning is the starting point for acknowledging the autonomy of the sciences which study the mind (D'Oro 2004 and 2013).
However, in the follow-up question on autonomy of producing good science, many indicated they disagreed (27/45, 60%) that striving for research outcomes undermined their authority or autonomy in scientific research.
Some philosophers tried to find a way of preserving the autonomy of the biological sciences without resort to special forces or entities.
This is none other than the familiar contemporary question of the autonomy of the special sciences (Fodor 1974).
In the first place, our earlier discussion shows that physicalism is not inconsistent with explanatory autonomy of the various sciences, so that one should not reject physicalism merely because one can't see how to reduce those sciences to others.
