The phrase "automated instruments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to tools or devices that operate automatically, often in contexts related to technology, engineering, or scientific research.
Example: "The laboratory is equipped with automated instruments that streamline the data collection process."
Alternatives: "automated devices" or "automated tools".
Automated instruments based on Magtration Technology were developed and used for nucleic acid extraction.
Since then, of course, sequencing technologies have advanced to the point that scientists have been replaced by all-in-one kits and highly automated instruments.
Although the static gravimetric method is still commonly used, automated instruments for the determination of sorption isotherms have been designed to overcome some of the drawbacks associated with the standard method.
Automated instruments reduce observer error and can print out measurements, ensuring that recorded data are accurate (O'Brien 2000).
Automated instruments such as Vitek 2 (bioMérieux), Phoenix 100 (BD Biosciences) and MicroScan WalkAway (Siemens) are commonly used methods for AST as they are easy to operate and reduce the time-to-result [ 11– 11].
In a previous study evaluating Vitek 2, essential agreements with nitrofurantoin were 93.7%% for staphylococci and 88.9 % for enterococci [ 25], indicating that susceptibility testing for nitrofurantoin may be difficult for automated instruments.
The ultimate sensitivity of the automated instrument is determined on the basis of a generic least square differences fitting procedure while the instrumental resolution is defined on the basis of realistic, rather than optimal, scenarios: the resolution of the rotation measurements are in the order of 8.7 ∗ 10−5 rad while the resolution of the displacement measurements are better than 5 μm.
A more definitive diagnosis can be obtained using corneal topography, in which an automated instrument projects the illuminated pattern onto the cornea and determines its topology from analysis of the digital image.
Considering the potential variability of 25OHD assays, we first tested assay performance on pilot samples in two different laboratories both running the immunochemiluminometric assay on the DiaSorin Liasion automated instrument.
In addition, the TMA was constructed using an automated instrument, ATA-27 (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA).
In the specialized laboratory of the Academic Medical Center, the returned FITs will be processed using the OC- Sensor - automated instrument.
