Sentence examples for automated conditions from inspiring English sources

AquaMaps is compared with traditional presence-only species distribution modelling methods to determine the quality of outputs under equivalently automated conditions.

Post-hoc tests for the ASWAT indicated marginally higher responses in the partially automated than baseline condition (p = 0.08), no significant difference between responses in the baseline and fully automated conditions (p = 0.96), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 0.14; Fig. 3).

Followup comparisons for the AATT Usefulness subscale indicated significantly lower responses in the partially automated than baseline condition (p < .01), significantly lower responses in the fully automated than baseline condition (p < .01), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 1.000; Fig. 11).

Post-hoc tests for the Cooper–Harper Trust scale indicated marginally higher responses in the partially automated than baseline condition (p = 0.06), significantly higher responses in the fully automated than baseline condition (p = 0.03), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 1.00; Fig. 7).

Post-hoc tests for the Cooper–Harper Situation Awareness scale indicated significantly higher responses in the partially automated than baseline condition (p < 0.01), significantly higher responses in the fully automated than baseline condition (p = 0.02), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 0.75; Fig. 6).

Post-hoc tests for the Trust subscale indicated significantly higher responses in the baseline than the partially automated condition (p < 0.01), significantly higher responses in the baseline than the fully automated condition (p < 0.01), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 1.00; Fig. 9).

Followup comparisons for the QUIS subscale indicated significantly higher responses in the baseline than partially automated condition (p < .05), significantly higher responses in the baseline than fully automated condition (p < .05), and no significant difference between responses in the partially and fully automated conditions (p = 0.784; Fig. 12).

Post-hoc tests for the Cooper–Harper Temporal Load scale indicated significant difference between responses in the baseline and partially automated conditions (p = 0.049), no significant difference between responses in the baseline and fully automated conditions (p = 0.845), and marginally higher responses in the partially automated than fully automated condition (p < 0.07 = 0.16; Fig. 5).

Post-hoc tests for the DALI indicated no significant difference between responses in the baseline and partially automated conditions (p = 0.06), no significant difference between responses in the baseline and fully automated conditions (p = 0.12), and significantly higher responses in the partially automated than fully automated condition (p < 0.01; Fig. 2).

In a case study, the process of implementing typical regulations shows the implications of automated working conditions checking in practice.

Automated currency condition screening requires an approximate model of the way human experts classify bank notes in terms of their fitness to be loaded into Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs).