The phrase "authors standpoint" is not correct in written English; it should be "author's standpoint." You can use it when discussing the perspective or viewpoint of a specific author in a literary or academic context.
Example: "In her novel, the author's standpoint on social issues is clearly articulated through the protagonist's experiences."
Alternatives: "author's perspective" or "author's viewpoint."
From a mechanical standpoint, some authors have limited themselves to estimating the contact zones: area and distribution.
Table 2 Analysis of arguments in papers supporting standpoint 1 (S1) Authors Overall arguments Premises including Biological Background Assumptions Conclusions Main Relevant Evidence Weber et al., 2012 Steiner et al., 2013 Kok et al., 2014 Kramer et al., 2016 Although involving randomness, conventional breeding is a safe procedure that introduces no novel safety issues.
From a theoretical standpoint, other authors have conjectured that the highly ordered, crystalline arrangement of collagen would confer it with various semiconductive properties, although no direct, objective data were provided in such cases [30], [31], [32].
When he states that, from a linguistic standpoint, "the author is never more than a man who writes", he clearly recognises that he or she is never anything less either.
Table 3 Analysis of papers supporting standpoint 2 (S2) Author Premise(s) Relevant evidence, or lack of relevant evidence Biological background assumptions and general hypotheses Aim of the study Londo et al. (2011) The advantage of a genetic modification depends on the context where plant lives (duration and strength of selective pressure).
What's less so, from a theatrical standpoint, is author Manus' determination to get everything into a 70-minute piece.
I originally wrote this post from the standpoint of independent authors, certainly one group very much at the mercy of our Rube Goldbergesque self-promotional models of hyper-media 2015.
You may choose to use this section to include any relevant information about the author(s) that may aid the reader's interpretation of the article, and understand the standpoint of the author(s).
These narratives are of course subjective, reflecting the standpoints of the authors, and there will no doubt be disagreement about the interpretation of history.
