The phrase "authors rule" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey a principle or guideline related to authorship, but it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "In this workshop, we will discuss the importance of the authors rule in academic writing."
Alternatives: "guidelines for authors" or "rules for authorship."
But neither did the authors rule out the possibility that in some baffling way distance running had contributed to the men's arterial gunk.
There's an authors' rule of thumb that warns against writing about time travel because of the insurmountable inconsistencies it rapidly throws up.
The authors rule out selection bias because the women in their sample are clearly ambitious types because they earned an MBA (though I knew a non-trivial number of women MBA candidates who proudly proclaimed they went to business school to find a rich husband).If Ms Folbre is correct, most working mothers are equally dedicated to their jobs and do not deserve to be paid less.
The authors rule out schizophrenia and other common psychoses because Chopin's hallucinations were visual, not auditory, and because he lacked other telltale symptoms such as eye problems or migraines.
The authors rule out this channel, as they show that the program is not associated with the value of houses (treatment households did not consider their houses to be more valuable than control households did), with changes in income, or with total consumption.
Can the authors rule out this possibility?
The authors ruled out RCVS, mainly because of the subacute and progressive onset of the clinical symptoms and normal MRA findings.
4) Have the authors ruled out an effect on protein synthesis?
Although the authors ruled out degradation by H2O2 by including catalase in the reaction, they did not characterize the products of the reaction.
The authors ruled out acetylcholinesterase inhibition as the cause of the alterations in the production of the neurotransmitters because they found no differences in acetylcholine activity in any of the regions of the brain used in the study.
A key point of the manuscript is that this is a unique phenolic regulator for these monocots but there is no description of how the authors ruled out dicot orthologues?
