The phrase "authorized language" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where specific language or terminology is officially approved or recognized, often in legal, technical, or organizational settings.
Example: "The contract must be drafted in the authorized language to ensure compliance with regulatory standards."
Alternatives: "official language" or "approved language".
"The new lease form also makes it clear that the co-op can issue shares for nonresidential space like storerooms, hallway closets and parking areas," he said, adding that without specific authorizing language in the lease, such actions might be vulnerable to legal challenge.
Q: The bill is quite detailed about the major activities within DOE's Office of Science, including authorizing language for the new energy hubs.
Meanwhile, Arun Majumdar, head of the 2-year-old Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy shop at DOE, says that passing the authorizing language "was a confirmation that we are on the right track".
Although actual spending levels for all of these activities and more are determined by appropriations committees, the authorizing language represents the science committee's considered opinion about the relative importance of various research activities within those agencies.
"We will not be taking a position on this bill just yet," said Aaron Fritschner, a spokesman for Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va).. "This is the only text we've seen so far and the sections on how the committee would work, its funding source, and authorizing language all have '[TBD]' in them".
But the same Congress' failure to pass language authorizing the president to use force against the Islamic State meant not enough oversight during war, he said.
Rather, they are authorized by language in the Congressional reports that accompany appropriations bills.
On Monday, his deputy campaign manager, Dimitri Kesari, reiterated that Mr. Paul "did not write, edit or authorize" the language.
(was) authorized by the language adopted". 23 Fully aware that the Executive Branch then, as in 1955, understood the provision as authorizing the imposition of monetary exactions, the Committee did not recommend any change in its wording to confine more narrowly the bounds of its authorization.
The government argued that this language authorized the NSA to collect metadata if at any future time the records might become "relevant" to an "authorized" criminal investigation.
