"authority status" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing a person, organization, or institution that is recognized as possessing a certain level of authority or authority-like qualities. For example, "The local historical society has achieved a level of authority status in the community, and their opinion is regularly sought for advice on matters of preservation."
Best-selling author, Brian Horn, helps entrepreneurs leverage their knowledge to gain authority status in their industry, then dramatically amplifies their message and shows how to convert the new audience into high paying customers.
But 27 bids so far in England for combined authority status have now been made – amid some disquiet that potentially significant changes are under way without a proper debate.
The effects of the two revolutions, the one overwhelmingly democratic in thrust, the other industrial-capitalist, have been to undermine, shake, or topple institutions that had endured for centuries, even millennia, and with them systems of authority, status, belief, and community.
Because the weak principal unilaterally relies on the strong principal, this gradually increases authority status of the strong principal and weakens the authority status of the weak principal, forming the "Matthew effect" of authority status (Merton 1968).
Will applied linguists continue to assert an expert or authority status in the determination of practice?
The authority status of affiliated principal is indicated by the political ranking of the leader.
In a ternary differentiated authority, the authority statuses of superior principals vary greatly.
Proposition 2.1 The Chinese government presents a ternary differentiated authority, and the authority statuses of the principals are completely different.
In a ternary differentiated authority, the authority statuses of principals are largely different, and principals are more likely to compare with principals who have similar functions and status.
Traditional theory holds that the statuses of multiple principals are similar, but the authority statuses of different Chinese state agencies vary greatly, which show a differentiated authority of the party committee > government > functional bureaus.
These findings indicate that the effectiveness of the quantification of reward and punishment should be reconsidered; the leadership that drives tasks and the authority statuses of the affiliated principals should also be taken into account.
