Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
authorities confirmed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "authorities confirmed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when reporting information that has been verified or validated by official sources or governing bodies. Example: "The authorities confirmed that the missing persons have been located safe and sound."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Canadian authorities confirmed four cases.
News & Media
Palestinian medical authorities confirmed the strike.
News & Media
Other authorities confirmed that the suspect was Mr. Mzoudi.
News & Media
Swiss authorities confirmed they were reviewing the request.
News & Media
The authorities confirmed only one of the killings.
News & Media
On Monday, Tanzanian authorities confirmed an outbreak of cholera.
News & Media
Chekatt, the suspect, is a French citizen, authorities confirmed.
News & Media
Authorities confirmed the arrest but gave no further details.
News & Media
Norwegian authorities confirmed Gilbert had been banned "indefinitely" by Israel.
News & Media
Using dental records, authorities confirmed that it was Sunil Tripathi.
News & Media
Spanish authorities confirmed on Sunday that Garrido was killed at the Bataclan concert hall.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "authorities confirmed", ensure the context clearly identifies which authorities are being referenced to maintain clarity and credibility.
Common error
Avoid using "authorities confirmed" without specifying the relevant authority. Vague references can weaken the statement's reliability.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "authorities confirmed" functions as a declarative statement indicating that official bodies have verified or validated certain information. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for reporting verified details.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "authorities confirmed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase primarily found in news and media contexts. According to Ludwig AI, it serves to convey that information has been officially verified, adding credibility to the statement. While the phrase itself is correct, it's essential to specify which authorities are being referenced to avoid vagueness and maintain clarity. Alternatives like "officials verified" or "the government acknowledged" can be used to provide more context or adjust the level of formality. In essence, this phrase is a reliable way to indicate official validation, provided it's used with precision and clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
officials verified
This alternative uses "officials" instead of "authorities", which can imply a slightly less formal or broader range of sources.
sources validated
This alternative focuses on the validation aspect, highlighting that information has been checked and approved by unspecified "sources".
it was officially verified
Adding "officially" emphasizes the formal nature of the verification, suggesting a procedural confirmation.
the government acknowledged
This alternative specifies the "government" as the acknowledging entity, limiting the source to governmental bodies.
the report corroborated
This alternative uses "corroborated" to indicate that a report supports or confirms the information.
the findings indicated
This option uses "findings indicated", focusing on the results or conclusions that support the statement.
experts ascertained
Using "experts ascertained" highlights that individuals with specialized knowledge have determined the accuracy of the information.
investigations revealed
This alternative suggests that the confirmation came as a result of a formal inquiry or examination.
the evidence substantiated
This option emphasizes that "evidence" supports the confirmation, focusing on factual proof.
it has been authenticated
This choice uses "authenticated" to imply that the information has been proven genuine or valid.
FAQs
How can I use "authorities confirmed" in a sentence?
Use "authorities confirmed" to indicate that information has been verified or validated by official sources. For example, "The authorities confirmed that the missing person was found safe".
What can I say instead of "authorities confirmed"?
You can use alternatives like "officials verified", "sources validated", or "the government acknowledged" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "authorities confirmed" or "it was confirmed by authorities"?
Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "authorities confirmed" is more concise and direct, making it preferable in most contexts. The passive voice construction "it was confirmed by authorities" may be useful when the focus is on the action rather than the actor.
What type of authorities are typically referenced when using "authorities confirmed"?
The type of authorities depends on the context. It could refer to legal authorities, medical authorities, government authorities, or any official body with the power to verify or validate information. Always clarify which specific authority you are referring to.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested