authoritative voice

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "authoritative voice" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a manner of speaking or writing that conveys confidence, expertise, and credibility. Example: "The speaker's authoritative voice commanded the attention of the audience, making them eager to hear more."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"There is no authoritative voice.

The Guardian - Music

When no authoritative voice can be found.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Enrique!" It was a strong, authoritative voice.

The New Yorker

Mr. Schmidt's is a friendly and authoritative voice.

The New York Times

And in an intimate, authoritative voice, it advances the conversation.

The New Yorker

Let me defer to a rather authoritative voice, that of Stravinsky.

The New York Times

Watson spoke in a calm, authoritative voice, and Bell changed the subject.

The New Yorker

And then this odd but rather lovingly authoritative voice came out of me.

The New Yorker

He added: "If you want an authoritative voice, go to the bishops.

The New York Times

He is tall, with a boyish face; she is short, with a hoarse, authoritative voice.

The New Yorker

In fact, there is no big, authoritative voice for women in France now".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In scenarios requiring directness and clarity, opt for an "authoritative voice" to ensure the message is understood and respected.

Common error

While "authoritative voice" denotes command and expertise, avoid using it in casual conversations or informal writing where a more relaxed tone is appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "authoritative voice" functions primarily as a descriptor, modifying a noun (either explicitly stated or implied) to indicate a source of information or a manner of speaking that carries weight, credibility, and expertise. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "authoritative voice" is a frequently used and grammatically correct phrase that signifies credibility and expertise. According to Ludwig AI, it effectively conveys trustworthiness and respect. Predominantly found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts, its alternatives include "commanding tone" and "credible source". Using an "authoritative voice" enhances writing by lending weight to statements and influencing the audience. Remember to avoid misplacing it in informal contexts and always backing it up with solid evidence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

strong voice

Focuses on the powerful and assertive nature of the voice.

authoritative tone

Highlights the manner of speaking that conveys authority.

credible voice

Stresses the believability and trustworthiness of the voice.

decisive voice

Implies a firm and resolute manner of speaking.

solid voice

Emphasizes the strength and reliability of the voice or source.

reliable voice

Emphasizes the dependability and accuracy of the information conveyed.

influential voice

Highlights the impact and power of the voice.

authoritative spokesman

Focuses on the person delivering the message with authority.

formal voice

Indicates a level of formality and professionalism.

genuine voice

Implies authenticity and sincerity in the voice.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "authoritative voice" in my writing?

To use an "authoritative voice" effectively, ensure your claims are supported by evidence, use precise language, and maintain a confident and respectful tone. This approach enhances credibility and persuades your audience.

What are some synonyms for "authoritative voice"?

Alternatives to "authoritative voice" include "commanding tone", "expert opinion", or "credible source". The best choice depends on the specific context.

In what situations is using an "authoritative voice" most beneficial?

Using an "authoritative voice" is most beneficial in situations where you need to convey expertise, provide guidance, or make decisions. Examples include academic writing, professional presentations, and leadership roles.

What's the difference between "authoritative voice" and "authoritarian voice"?

"Authoritative voice" implies expertise and credibility, earning respect through knowledge. In contrast, "authoritarian voice" suggests dominance and control, demanding obedience regardless of expertise. While related, they differ significantly in tone and intent.