The phrase "authoritative rules" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to rules or guidelines that are recognized as valid and enforceable, often in a legal or formal context.
Example: "The organization has established authoritative rules that all members must follow to ensure compliance and order."
Alternatives: "binding regulations" or "official guidelines".
"It's almost like that authoritative rule to be successful in life and, you know, make money and do all these things".
Basic human needs and circumstances powerfully suggest to people in virtually all times and places that they should make and uphold some norms of the kind we call law, norms which will depend directly and for the most part on social facts such as custom, authoritative rule-making, and adjudication.
An ethicist refutes justice arguments that a fundamental right to bodily integrity exists warranting the abolition by the state of parental rights to have their son circumcised, pointing out that, " neither the UNCRC nor the ethics literature provides an authoritative rule for resolving conflicts between rights" [ 45].
Smaller monasteries for men and women emerged in Cappadocia under the influence of the Greek theologian St. Basil the Great (c. 330 379), who composed the first widely authoritative monastic rule in Eastern Orthodox Christianity.
Sources that are of more recent origin are generally accepted as more authoritative, and specific rules take precedence over general rules.
Thus, different strands of regulation studies share an agreement on the subject of regulation (the state), the object (the behaviour of nongovernmental actors), the instruments (an authoritative set of rules), or the domain of application (e.g., the economy).
In fact agents with different expertise themselves would find different legal rules authoritative.
His name translates to "strength of the land, incomparable power," and the king was an authoritative figure, his rule sacrosanct, and his absolute power insulated by a powerful military that staged a coup in 2014, overthrowing the country's democratically elected government.
On one authoritative definition of the rule (decision of the Privy Council in Subramaniam v PP, (1956) 1 Weekly Law Reports 965), what it prohibits is the use of a hearsay statement to prove the truth of the facts asserted therein.[10] The objection is to the drawing of the inference that p from X's out-of-court statement that p where X is not available to be examined in court.
Even a shrewd observer such as Martin Jacques makes the absurd case in his authoritative recent book, When China rules the world, that China's rise is "peaceful".
